What is real? (Quantum^1) Contact^2 creates a realness moment.^3 A realness moment^4(i.e a c^2 isness quantum or unit) is absolute (thus absolutely true/real^5) because it happens @c in a relativity vacuum. Because absolute, that is to say, not relativised, a once off, thus random realness quantum/moment resulting from the collision of 2 random quanta can only be noted/registered as a realness moment but not identified.^6 What can be identified is the affect of (i.e. as response to) a (repeating) series of realness quanta. However, because the emerged identity of a series of realness quanta is dependent on the constituents/relativity of the series and on the data processing state/relativity of the affected, it is relative and of diminished trueness/realness.^7 In short, momentary (thus random) contact is real/true/certain. A non-random because repeating series of random contacts is untrue/unreal/uncertain because relative.^8 Home © 2021 by Victor Langheld

1. For ‘quantum’ read: a (complete, hence certain) whole, unit or digit; a discrete unit of momentum. 2. For contact (i.e. touch) read: instruction, strike or impact, that is to say, a percept that turns ON. Contact that makes real is complete, hence certain. In-struction (i.e. strike/contact or percept that turns ON) is always positive, hence the emergence of Positivism. Contact, i.e. quantised (or digitised) strike/touch between 2 random quanta is always random because happening in a relativity vacuum. Since a strike/contact that does not happen cannot be perceived/registered, the notion of a no-strike (or negative) contact (or OFF) is a fantasy. Indeed, the concept of ‘negative’ is a fantasy, albeit useful in, for instance, maths, about which nothing (meaningful) can be said. It’s not possible to comment on something that didn’t happen. 3. On-going realness (i.e. seeming realness extension) is falsely generated by on observer from on-going (but discontinuous) digital (or quantised) isness or realness moments. The naïve ancient (or primitive) notion that realness (or reality) (idem consciousness) exists as eternally present is simply false. All observer generated identifiable realities (i.e. as incomplete, hence uncertain contact series) happen as quantised affects resulting from series of individual quantum strikes self-displayed (as personal illusion) in analogue; in much the same way that a ‘movie’ actually consists of a series of individual ‘static’ frames. 4. i.e. the basic quantum or unit of realness that serves as unidentifiable basic quantum of knowledge. What is identified is a the supervening self-generated emergent of a contact series. 5. i.e. undeniable, i.e. because complete, thus certain. 6. A (always random) contact, hence isness (or realness) moment, has no formal (i.e. relative) attributes, hence cannot be identified. 7. In other words, individual strikes/contacts are complete and therefore certain (thus real/true) but series of such contacts (or there local emergents) per se are relative, thus incomplete and uncertain (i.e. having reduced trueness content). 8. In other words, the identifiable world, and which is always an observer/receiver generated illusion, is real/true by means of contact. But its (relative) shape/form, i.e. a supervening identity, is uncertain (more or less false/relative) because it is both series and receiver processing set-up dependent. What is reality? Defining ‘true’