Naturing as Automaton Naturing, the dynamic quantised1 procedure2 that enables
the emergence of the cosmos3 of quantised identifiable
realities, happens as dynamic response to turbulence.4 That response
procedure, hence naturing,5 is automatic and blind,6 hence an
automaton.7 Each emerged identifiable reality,8 happening as
it does as differential recursion9 of the basic procedure,
likewise operates as automaton.10 © 2022 by Victor
Langheld |
1. For ‘quantised’
read: digitised, i.e. bit by bit. 2. For ‘procedure’
read: the application of a set of
constraints (or rules or laws, indeed forces, as in the 4 fundamental forces
of nature). The set of constraints/rules operate as a machine (e.g. the
Universal Turing Machine). 3. For cosmos
read: The totality of individual identifiable realities. Note Patanjali’s 2nd
Yoga Sutra: ‘Yoga is the restriction of (mental) turbulence.’ 4. i.e. caused by
random momenta, i.e. by energy pulses-as-quanta. 5. Spinoza’s natura naturans (i.e. as dynamic procedure). 6. Therefore
indiscriminate. In short, all emergents are equal before the (natural) law.
Because equal before the law, the law is just and adjusts. 7. The NOD defines
automaton as: a machine (i.e. procedure) that performs a function
according to set of (coded) instructions (hence constraints or rules). An
automaton consisting of a set of rules/constraints self-organises and
self-regulates but does no have an independent SELF or SOUL, as claimed by
naïve ancient and modern Indians et al. 8. Spinoza’s natura naturata, i.e. as limited (i.e. stilled, stopped,
sliced or blocked) dynamic procedure. 9. To wit, as
localised variation, thus as alternative rather than as opposite. 10. High complexity
(i.e. surface structure) emergents, such as biological phenomena like the
single cell blob, the gecko or the human, emerge the capacity for memory and
with it the capacity/freedom to de-automize (survival) procedures. |